Skip to main content
    Methodology

    Transparent, Data-Driven Rankings

    The Super Human Directory is built on the belief that credibility, impact, and transparency matter more than hype. Rankings cannot be purchased. We combine independently verifiable data sources into a single composite score so that anyone—from patients to investors—can understand why an expert appears where they do.

    Composite Score Formula

    Each expert receives a weighted score between 0 and 100. Scores are normalized within the longevity cohort so that a 90 in Publication Impact means the expert is in the top decile for that dimension.

    WEIGHTED SCORE FORMULA
    (Publication Impact × 0.30)+(Clinical Footprint × 0.25)+(Peer Recognition × 0.20)+(Public Influence × 0.15)+(Innovation / IP × 0.10)
    Maximum possible composite score: 100

    Component Breakdown

    Each of the five components is scored on a 0–100 scale based on underlying metrics. Scores are then normalized across the cohort and combined using the weights above.

    Publication Impact

    30%

    Peer-reviewed contributions, citation strength, and leadership in academic research.

    Key metrics include:

    Publications countH-indexCitation impactJournal quality

    Clinical Footprint

    25%

    Real-world impact through clinical practice, trials, and patient outcomes.

    Key metrics include:

    Clinical trialsClinical rolesPatient volumeInstitutional footprint

    Peer Recognition

    20%

    How the expert is regarded by peers through awards, positions, and citations.

    Key metrics include:

    Awards & honorsEditorial boardsSociety leadershipPeer citations

    Public Influence

    15%

    Reach and trust with the broader public across media and digital platforms.

    Key metrics include:

    Media appearancesPodcast episodesBooks & contentAudience reach

    Innovation / IP

    10%

    Novel contributions translated into products, patents, and companies.

    Key metrics include:

    PatentsStartups foundedProducts launchedR&D funding

    Letter Grade Scale

    To make scores easier to interpret at a glance, we map composite scores to letter grades.

    GradeScore RangeLabel
    S90–100Exceptional
    A75–89Outstanding
    B60–74Strong
    C45–59Moderate
    D0–44Emerging

    Data Sources

    We aggregate data from multiple independent providers. Each source is versioned and monitored for changes over time.

    Academic & Research

    • • PubMed, Crossref, and similar publication databases
    • • Google Scholar and citation metrics providers
    • • Institutional repositories and grant databases

    Clinical & Trials

    • • ClinicalTrials.gov and international trial registries
    • • Hospital and clinic rosters
    • • Specialty society registers where available

    Innovation & IP

    • • Patent offices (USPTO, EPO and others)
    • • Startup and funding databases
    • • Product launch and company filings

    Public Influence

    • • Podcast and media appearance indexes
    • • Book and long-form content platforms
    • • Public speaking, conference, and event listings

    Conflict of Interest Policy

    Rankings cannot be bought. Commercial relationships with Super Human Network—including sponsorships, partnerships, and consulting—do not influence expert scores or positions. Any potential conflicts are reviewed by an internal governance process and, where relevant, disclosed.

    If a material conflict of interest is identified for a specific expert, their profile may be annotated or their scores temporarily withheld until the issue is resolved.

    Claim & Verification

    Experts can claim their profile to suggest corrections, add context, and provide additional data. Verification requires:

    • Proof of identity and control of professional email addresses.
    • Confirmation of primary affiliations and titles.
    • Review of suggested changes by the Super Human editorial team.

    Verified experts receive a badge on their profile. Verification does not guarantee a higher ranking; instead, it improves data quality and context around the existing score.

    FAQ

    How do I get listed?

    We periodically expand the directory by scanning new data sources and communities. You can also nominate yourself or a colleague via our contact form; nominations are evaluated using the same criteria as all other experts.

    Can I pay to improve my ranking?

    No. Rankings are data-driven and cannot be purchased or expedited through commercial relationships.

    How are ties broken?

    When two experts share the same composite score, we use secondary ordering signals such as Publication Impact and Clinical Footprint. In some cases, tied experts may share the same displayed rank.

    I found an error—how do I fix it?

    Use the “Report inaccuracy” link on the relevant expert profile or contact us directly. We review submissions on a rolling basis and update profiles once the underlying data has been verified.

    Methodology Versions

    v1.0 — February 2026Current

    Initial launch of the five-component composite score (Publication Impact, Clinical Footprint, Peer Recognition, Public Influence, Innovation / IP) and letter grade scale (S–D).